Epenthesis in Pakistani Urduized English: Optimality Analysis
Keywords:Epenthesis, Urduized English, constraints, ranking of constraints
The current research paper describes the process of epenthesis in Pakistani Urduized English. The main purpose of the study is to discuss the English borrowed words and their usage in the spoken Urdu version in Pakistan within the framework of Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky, 1993). The study discusses the processes of phoneme alteration in Urduaized English and how the Urdu speakers substitute and break the consonant cluster in communication. The issues of phoneme deletion, phoneme alternation, voicing, and devoicing can be resolved by applying Optimality Theory and ranking of constraints. In the paper, we argue that adoption of loan words in Urduaized English leads to certain phonological processes like epenthesis, which can be described within OT. Moreover, the study discusses the reasons for phonological addition or deletion within the borrowed lexical item. The study finds in Pakistani English, epenthesis is widely used processes on certain CC clusters at onset and coda positions of the syllables. In addition, the epenthesis process is conditioned to certain markedness constraints in Pakistani English. The study recommends a spectrographic analysis to find the spectrographic features on epenthesis.
Abbas, S. (2002). “Language of the Armies, Urdu: A Derivative of Persian and Avestan” In Persian Language and Literaterature. Iran Chamber Society. Retrieved: 02/2011 http://www.iranchamber.com/literature/articles/language_of_armies.php.
Campbell, L. (2004). Historical Linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Grimes, B. 2000. “Pakistan”. In Ethnologue. Languages of the World. 14th ed. Dallas, Texas Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Humayoun, M., Hammarström, H., &Ranta, A. (2006). Urdu morphology, orthography and lexicon extraction. Chalmers tekniskahögskola.
Haidar, S. & Manan. S (2021). English in Pakistan: Language policy, features and present day use. Language Planning and Policy. Retrieved : 20/2023 file:///Users/mac/Downloads/TNFUK_17_ENAS_C017_docbook_new_indd1%20(1).pdf
Keer, E. (1999). Geminates, the OCP and the nature of CON. PhD dissertation, Rutgers
Krämer, M. (2008). English schwa insertion before liquids and phonological opacity. Proceedings of CLS 41. Chicago Linguistic Society.
Mangrio, R. A. (2016). The morphology of loanwords in Urdu: The Persian, Arabic and English strands. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Mushtaq, M., Khurshid, R., & Khan, M. K. (2020). Analyzing English Language Teaching Practices in Public Middle Schools of AJK, Pakistan. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 9(1), 18-30.
McCarthy, J. J. & Prince, A. (1994). The Emergence of the Unmarked: Optimality in Prosodic Morphology. Ms, UMass Amherst and Rutgers University.
Rehman, T. (1998). “Linguistics in Pakistan [Canada]: A Country Report”. In Rajindra Singh The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics (ed) (Delhi: Sage Publications,). pp 184-196.
Picard, M. (2003). On the emergence and resolution of hiatus. Folia Linguistica Historica 24(1-2).
Selkirk, E. (1990). A two-root theory of length. In: Dunlap, E. & Padgett, J. (Eds) UMOP 14. Papers in phonology. Amherst, Mass: GLSA.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Shahid Mir, Prof. Dr. Ayaz Afsar, Dr. Sehrish Shafi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.